Publishing velocity, the #1 SEO strategy?

A critical look at this SEO strategy.

Earlier this week, I read that publishing velocity is the #1 SEO strategy:

“There are at least hundreds, but probably thousands, and often tens of thousands of keywords that can send your business qualified traffic.

But you won’t rank for every keyword by writing one page of content.

Or two pages of content.

Or ten pages of content.

To capture all of the qualified searches across your funnel and truly be everywhere your target audience is searching, you probably need to publish hundreds of pages of content.

The concept is quite simple. The more you publish, the more keywords you capture.

Just look at for a case study. published 430 pages in an 11 month period. 50% of which were published in the last 30 days.

The results are shown above: 0 to 142,000 monthly visitors in under a year.

In that time, their domain rating didn’t change at all (hovering around 65) showing the increase in traffic wasn’t thanks to a boost in backlinks (which usually fuels DR scores).

Looking at an analysis of their organic keywords, we can see that Do Not Pay earns about 50,000 visitors a month from keywords that rank in the top 3 positions. But the other 150,000 come from lower-ranking words. 

DoNotPay ranks at positions 11-100 for 200,000 organic keywords (and increase from ~2,000 before publishing so many articles).

This perfectly illustrates the power of publishing velocity.

It’s not easy to rank number one.

But if you write 400 pages covering a whole host of keywords you can rapidly accelerate organic positions.

Instead of one article that hits number one, they have 200-300 that hit the top 10 and 20 for several keywords.

This spray tactic clearly works, bringing traffic in bits across every article. followed a similar strategy with similar results.

They published 100 pages in four months. Moving from 500 to ~60,000 visitors a month in 13 months.

It actually doesn’t seem to matter what the domain authority of a website is. Velocity works.

DoggyPedia (200 pages published in 6 months, rose from 0 to 116,000 visitors per month within a year).

All of the above publish an insane volume of content. That’s what appears to win them so much traffic.

This is quite a brilliant SEO strategy, in appearance.

A critical look at the traffic

Let's try to look at the above case studies more critically. We're making real business decisions based on this data after all.

I'm building out the SentiSum SEO strategy right now, and I certainly don't want to create 400 articles without REVENUE in mind. We can do it. Between 4-5 of us, every quarter we could 50-60 pieces of fair quality content. But, it's very time-consuming.

If I'm going to get us 100,000 visitors a month, I want them to be the right visitors. One's that can be captured by a lead magnet and nurtured through to a sale. My immediate fear with the above case studies is that the traffic is irrelevant to that business. So let's take a quick look at that.

DoNotPay is a mobile app robot lawyer. They help the little person to fight parking tickets and other lawsuits without the heavy costs associated.

DoNotPay's top 10 drivers of organic search traffic

From #2, Chegg free trials, they answer what the visitor is looking for well. They then encourage signups to their free trial of a 'virtual card generator', which happens to be  #1 on the above list.

The number one ranked page above address something frustrating for visitors: free trials rolling over to a full paid account without warning.

I think this is smart, they've created a really valuable service designed to capture new users and are driving visitors to it.

They've created 84 pieces of content like this one. Targeting 'company name' and 'free trial'. All of which have an extremely similar structure and drive signups to the company's product.

This is genius because they found a replicable, scalable way to generate leads. Reducing the work needed on each article through the similarities. ‍

Each article included a high-value lead magnet that encourages registrations by the right target audience.

Logic Inbound's top 10 drivers of content

LogicInbound is a marketing agency focused on doctor practices.

‍We saw that the team had built up to 60,000 organic traffic visitors a month over 2018.

‍Their number one ranked page is 'How to contact Instagram'. I find the content highly irrelevant to the company's business model, and the proof is in the pudding that this page is covered in Google Adverts—indicating this is a secondary revenue stream.

‍While targeting keywords like this may increase traffic, my best guess is that they don't drive qualified leads. Making this kind keyword for the sake of it strategy not favourable to my SEO plan at SentiSum, where we sell a high ticket SaaS software and would certainly hurt brand image by placing Google Ads on the site.

‍Digging deeper into the latest organic data shows that post-January 2019, LogicInbound had an almighty slump in traffic anyway.

Could this be a reflection of a short-term SEO plan that didn't include high-quality content? It's strange to me that a company that wrote 100 pages of content in four months saw little long-term benefit to that.

‍The last thing we want is increased organic search traffic with zero impact on long-term business growth.

My next post on this subject will dive into how to do the above strategy in more detail. What keywords to target and how to plan a content calendar that his prolifically high volume.

Subscribe on this Substack to get notified in the next How the Fxck newsletter.

Data Sources: